CONTROVERSIAL🚨: Tension grips West Bengal after police busted a voter ID racket in Nadia, recovering over 10,000 cards allegedly prepared for election manipulation. Opposition parties have accused the ruling TMC of orchestrating the scam to sway upcoming votes, while officials say an investigation is underway to trace the masterminds. #WestBengal #VoterID #SIR #scrolllink

In Tamil Nadu’s Tirupur district, a controversy erupted after Ajmal Khan was reportedly seen performing namaz inside a Vinayagar temple. The incident, captured on video, sparked outrage among locals and Hindu groups, who viewed it as a deliberate act of disrespect toward Hindu traditions. Authorities have launched an inquiry into the matter, while community leaders have called for maintaining peace and respecting all religious sentiments. The incident has reignited debates over rising instances of religious provocation and the need for stronger measures to preserve communal harmony in the state. Source: X/GudumbaSatti

WHY GROKIPEDIA IS MAKING THE MEDIA MELTDOWN - AND WHY THAT’S A GOOD THING The legacy media is melting down over a digital encyclopedia. Not a government scandal. Not a war. A website. It’s called Grokipedia, Elon's AI-powered alternative to Wikipedia, and it has already done the unthinkable: challenged the establishment’s control over online “truth.” Launched in beta as version 0.1, Grokipedia already has more than 885,000 entries, and that’s just the start. Musk says version 1.0 is coming soon and promises it will be “ten times better”. Better than what? According to Musk: better than Wikipedia itself. And if you look at how both sites handle controversial topics, he might be right. Wikipedia is run by volunteers, but let’s not kid ourselves, ideological gatekeeping is baked into its DNA. From politics to culture to science, pages are shaped by editors who lean overwhelmingly left. Anyone who’s ever tried to update a conservative viewpoint knows what happens: instant reversion, flags, bans, and “consensus.” It’s not “the wisdom of the crowd.” It’s the orthodoxy of a very specific crowd. Grokipedia’s arrival struck a nerve because it breaks that consensus. It doesn’t just rewrite articles, it reframes narratives. The BLM entry? It notes the movement’s scale, but also includes the violence, property damage, and 25 deaths linked to the 2020 riots. Wikipedia barely mentions that. The Tucker Carlson page? It calls out the systemic media bias he exposed, citing actual reporting, something Wikipedia refuses to do without filtering it through their editorial “neutrality” filter. Even the entry on Elon Musk pulls no punches. It praises his impact, while noting the relentless attacks from left-leaning media. Shocking, right? This isn’t about articles, it’s about power. Wikipedia has held a near-monopoly over online reference knowledge since 2001. Now, an AI-driven, open-access rival shows up and suddenly every blue-check pundit is in DEFCON 1 mode. The panic isn’t about errors. It’s about losing control over the narrative. Grokipedia lets people see different angles, uncensored, and that alone makes it dangerous to the establishment. Truth Doesn’t Need a Gatekeeper Grokipedia isn’t perfect. No source is. But it offers something we haven’t had in a long time: real competition in the knowledge economy. And that’s exactly why it’s driving Wikipedia’s defenders, and their media allies, absolutely mad. If your version of “truth” can’t stand up to a free marketplace of ideas, maybe it was never the truth to begin with. #wikipedia #mayopedia #Grokipedia #scrolllink

A world first. New footage from Mars rendered in stunning 4K resolution. We also talk about the cameras on board the Martian rovers and how we made the video. The cameras on board the rovers were the height of technology when the respective missions launched. A question often asked is: ‘Why don’t we actually have live video from Mars?’ Although the cameras are high quality, the rate at which the rovers can send data back to earth is the biggest challenge. Curiosity can only send data directly back to earth at 32 kilo-bits per second. Instead, when the rover can connect to the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, we get more favourable speeds of 2 Megabytes per second. As you would expect, sending HD video at these speeds would take a long long time. As nothing really moves on Mars, it makes more sense to take and send back images. #Marse #Planet #rovers #curiosity #orbiter #images #scrolllink #science